Diamond/Pearl

Since Pebble Version is a Pokemon comic, the forums need a place to discuss anything and everything Pokemon.

Moderators: Silver, shauni

Post Reply
User avatar
Neo Zanther
Pokémon Champion
Posts: 8127
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:40 am
Location: Deep in the Dark forest of D-Edge

Post by Neo Zanther »

I agree. Getting all 386 is a big pain as is. I don't own the GC game so I'll have to get them from my friend. Or cards...
Image
Image
User avatar
shauni
Articuno
Posts: 6659
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:34 am
Location: Merseyside, England
Contact:

Post by shauni »

*stamps on nintendo boss's head*
Stop milking the public, make 2 games with all the pokemon in like you used to, dont try anything funnie like last time!!!! !o! :matrix:
"BOW BEFORE THE SHAUNINESS THAT IS SHAUNI! "--Shadowman

"Shauni fell down a drainage ditch and died. That was the end of her pokemon journey. "--Shauni


Go to ROM the Comic

Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Pokemon Master
Gym Leader
Posts: 2711
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: I'm sorry, I've seem to have forgotten

Post by Pokemon Master »

Josiah wrote: Well, it's pretty much a given that D/P are going to be the next games in the main series.  Now, here's the question, will they be able to import pok?mon from R/S and FR/LG or will we have to start all over for the thrid time?
There going to do Pokemon Emerald, a 3rd game of R/S

But I doubt there's going to be a 3rd game for the Fire and Leaf versions, because that was a remake with a bunch of extra features so you could get all 386 on R/S

It's possible though, but I still doubt it
Listen to world around you and don't put it on mute- Mute
RyanHaylett
Combusken
Posts: 249
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 8:43 pm
Location: In Pennsylvania
Contact:

Post by RyanHaylett »

I know 500 dosn't seem doable but think, 386 pokemon isn't realy alot, now if I were to bring up the animals coegsisting with pokemon question then the awnser will probly be no, so then there would have to be millions of pokemon, and if there were pokemon since the begining of time then there real should be more also.
User avatar
shauni
Articuno
Posts: 6659
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:34 am
Location: Merseyside, England
Contact:

Post by shauni »

*pokes nintendo*

What kindo of pokemon can they possibly come up ith, the last lot were almost just rip offs of previeus pokemon
"BOW BEFORE THE SHAUNINESS THAT IS SHAUNI! "--Shadowman

"Shauni fell down a drainage ditch and died. That was the end of her pokemon journey. "--Shauni


Go to ROM the Comic

Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by Silver »

I know... look at Speal! And the ones that didn't resemble another Pokemon at all were really creepy (Ludicolo?! You've gotta be kiding me...).

And there IS going to be an Emerald Version, or should I say, there IS an Emerald Version already. It's been out in Japan for a while.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
User avatar
Pokemon Master
Gym Leader
Posts: 2711
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: I'm sorry, I've seem to have forgotten

Post by Pokemon Master »

Silver wrote: And there IS going to be an Emerald Version, or should I say, there IS an Emerald Version already. It's been out in Japan for a while.
I already knew that. I think you misunderstood my post.
Listen to world around you and don't put it on mute- Mute
User avatar
shauni
Articuno
Posts: 6659
Joined: Wed Jul 07, 2004 3:34 am
Location: Merseyside, England
Contact:

Post by shauni »

<_<
TO.....MUCH......MILKING....OF....THE ....PUBLIC!!!!!
"BOW BEFORE THE SHAUNINESS THAT IS SHAUNI! "--Shadowman

"Shauni fell down a drainage ditch and died. That was the end of her pokemon journey. "--Shauni


Go to ROM the Comic

Image Image Image Image Image
User avatar
Josiah
Mew
Posts: 25726
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Hawaii
Contact:

Post by Josiah »

Well, when it comes down to it they kinda have to add new pok?mon which each new release. Still, you're right about R/S, a lot of the pok?mon were just copies of older ones they didn't put in the game. Personally I'd rather see them spend more time on evolving the gameplay than making more things to catch. Just imagine if pok?mon used a faster battle system like FFX's...
Image

My signature site. Because ripping off Silver's ideas is fun.
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by Silver »

Yeah, they need at least a few new Pokemon to make the game a little more interesting. They didn't need 135 new Pokemon, though... all they REALLY need is new starters and new legendaries. Starters make it more interesting, legendaries are usually involved wioth the plot in some way. That's all they need, they've got almost 386 perfectly good Pokemon already in existance. (Notice the ALMOST is referring to the PERFECTLY GOOD-ness of SOME Pokemon...) Although a few more Dragon or Dark types couldn't hurt...
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
User avatar
Pokemon Master
Gym Leader
Posts: 2711
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: I'm sorry, I've seem to have forgotten

Post by Pokemon Master »

Josiah wrote: Just imagine if pok?mon used a faster battle system like FFX's...
Yeah! 3 on 3 batttling :applaud:
Listen to world around you and don't put it on mute- Mute
User avatar
Neo Zanther
Pokémon Champion
Posts: 8127
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 11:40 am
Location: Deep in the Dark forest of D-Edge

Post by Neo Zanther »

I agree with needing more Dragon and Dark. Add afew Ghosts in also. There is a 3rd for the LG/FR. It's called Thunder Yellow. That will be nice :)
Image
Image
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by Silver »

Yeah, I saw Screenshots for it. Needless to say it's a remake of Yellow, which was actually quite a bit different from R/B/G, so in a way it'll be worth it... as long as they didn't kill that surfing Pikachu mini-game! That was the best, man... Er... They're probably considering not releasing it though, not many people would buy it if it's just a remake... but I know I would! Mwahahaha!
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
User avatar
Pokemon Master
Gym Leader
Posts: 2711
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 11:06 pm
Location: I'm sorry, I've seem to have forgotten

Post by Pokemon Master »

Silver wrote: Yeah, I saw Screenshots for it. Needless to say it's a remake of Yellow, which was actually quite a bit different from R/B/G, so in a way it'll be worth it... as long as they didn't kill that surfing Pikachu mini-game! That was the best, man... Er... They're probably considering not releasing it though, not many people would buy it if it's just a remake... but I know I would! Mwahahaha!
I'm not buying it's, just a remake(R/B/G/Y) of a remake(fr/lg)


Where did you find screenshots?
Listen to world around you and don't put it on mute- Mute
User avatar
Silver
Shiny Pidgeot King
Posts: 18079
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 9:25 pm
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow
Contact:

Post by Silver »

This weird Spanish site... I found it on a google search for Pidgeot, I think.
"Irregardless" and "Over exaggerated" are NEVER CORRECT EVER because they are redundant
Regardless means "without regard", and adding "ir" on the front actually makes it a double negative; exaggerate means "to overstate" so you're literally saying "over overstate."
Example: I can not exaggerate the importance of this fact enough, regardless of how often people ignore it.
Image
Post Reply